View source for Talk:Boundary extension

== Reviewer C:  ==

This is a nice, detailed overview of boundary extension.  It takes a bit more of a theoretical stand on the preferred interpretation for boundary extension than I would expect for an encyclopedia entry. Perhaps the authors could make it a little more neutral.  It might also be nice to add a section on unresolved issues and discrepancies with existing accounts.  The entry is also fairly long for a brief review of this sort.

A couple minor notes:  line 3 is missing an "of" in error of commission.  The pros and cons section mentions 3 distinctive patterns but the numbered list after the colon only has 2.  The term "ocular occlusion" needs to be defined -- it's jargon.