lecture 7
From Scholarpedia
| This article has not been peer-reviewed or accepted for publication yet; It may be unfinished, contain inaccuracies, or unapproved changes. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Author: Dr. Jan A. Sanders, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Author: Dr. Sara Lombardo, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Contents |
Spectral sequences
In the examples, one uses
, but in the construction of the spectral sequence
one only assumes
and
.
definition
Let
for
,
for
.
remark
If
then
.
proposition
, where
denote the
-invariant elements (under
) in
.
proof
implies
,
that is, for
one has
.
proposition
proof
implies that for
one has, since
,
.
proposition
proof
Let
. Then
and
. But this immediately implies that
.
proposition
proof
Let
.
Then one can write
as
,
with
, that is to say,
and
.
Since
,
it follows that
.
definition
remark
In particular,
, that is, the graded version of the filtered sequence
.
theorem
On
there is an induced coboundary operator
such that
This means that
is a spectral sequence.
proof
maps
to
and
to
.
Let
. Define
One has
.
Suppose
is a cocycle. This means that
.
That is, there exist
and
such that
.
Let
, with
.
Therefore
.
This implies that
.
It follows that
The
-coboundaries consist of the elements of
, and one has
Noether isomorphism
If
then
and
.
It follows that
proposition
.
proof
Let
.
Then
with
.
Therefore
, since
.
It follows that
proposition
.
proof
Let
. Then
and
.
This implies
.
On the other hand, if
, we have
and
.
Thus,
and
, implying
.
Furthermore,
and
, implying
.
The result follows.
corollary
This proves the theorem.
