Help:Users

From Scholarpedia
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (User 1 (Assistant Editor): Added a mention and link to main page)
(User 4 (Editor): Copyediting)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
[[Image:Crystal_collaboration.png|thumb|right|320px| Scholarpedia is a collaborative project that welcomes contributions from all over the world.  
 
[[Image:Crystal_collaboration.png|thumb|right|320px| Scholarpedia is a collaborative project that welcomes contributions from all over the world.  
 
Image: [http://www.cchem.berkeley.edu/knrgrp/an.html crystal structure of Pu(1,2-HOPO)<sub>4</sub>], courtesy of Kenneth N. Raymond.]]
 
Image: [http://www.cchem.berkeley.edu/knrgrp/an.html crystal structure of Pu(1,2-HOPO)<sub>4</sub>], courtesy of Kenneth N. Raymond.]]
This <strong>Help:Users</strong> page provides orientation to first-time users who spontaneously joined Scholarpedia. Invited authors, reviewers, editors are not directly concerned by its contents.
+
This <strong>Help:Users</strong> page provides orientation to first-time users who have decided to join Scholarpedia of their own accord.  
  
Scholarpedia is a collaborative project held by a set of rules which, at first sight, might appear confusing or too restrictive, but that have been conceived to achieve and protect the main target of the project: give to the readers the highest quality and content-reliability as possible.
+
Please not that if you are interested only in reading through articles, registration is unnecessary.  
  
If you are interested only in reading our articles, a registration is not mandatory. Please enjoy our encyclopedia and advertise it among your friends and colleagues!
+
If you are interested in contributing to the development of Scholarpedia, then first of all: thanks! Secondly, please take a quick look at the following instructions -- Scholarpedia is different from Wikipedia. In particular, Scholarpedia has instituted a set of rules that are aimed at ensuring that its pages remain trustworthy and authoritative. 
  
If you wish to contribute more actively to the development of Scholarpedia, you need to register, and, more important, to acquire a minimum of knowledge that is required to act construtively and efficiently. If you haven't already, see Scholarpedia's [[Main_Page|main page]] where the project and its policies are detailed. Different actions are possible, as listed below. Your contributions will be evaluated by authors and the editorial team, and the value of these contributions will be reflected by your [[Scholarpedia:Scholar_Index|scholar index]].
+
To begin contributing, you will need to do the following:
 +
# register for a user account
 +
# read these instructions
 +
# read the Scholarpedia [[Main_Page|main page]], which gives a detailed overview of the project and its policies are detailed.  
 +
 
 +
As your contributions are evaluated by authors and editors, your [[Scholarpedia:Scholar_Index|scholar index]] will increase, leading to increased privileges and prominence in the Scholarpedia community.  Detailed below are a few ways of helping out.
  
 
== Suggesting authors/titles ==
 
== Suggesting authors/titles ==
 
Authors of Scholarpedia are always invited by editors, on the basis of the following rule of thumb:
 
Authors of Scholarpedia are always invited by editors, on the basis of the following rule of thumb:
  
'''priority in invitations is given to inventors/creators, then to world-wide acknowledged experts who are responsible for major advancement in the field/topic.
+
'''original or key inventors/creators/discoverers associated with a topic are invited first, followed by globally acknowledged experts responsible for major and continued advancement in the topic.
 
'''  
 
'''  
  
If there is doubt about who is the best expert to write an article, an [[Scholarpedia:Election|election]] can be initiated. Note that in the case of two or three researchers who have worked in close collaboration towards a discovery, co-authorship is preferable to an election. Further explanations on this policy are available on Scholarpedia's [[Main_Page|main page]].
+
If there are multiple acknowledged experts, an [[Scholarpedia:Election|election]] can be initiated. Elections are only necessary when the authors are otherwise unaffiliated with each other --if multiple researchers have worked in close collaboration towards a discovery, co-authorship is preferable to an election.  
  
Any suggestion complying to our priority rule of thumb is always welcome. To suggest an author X for a title Y, send an email to '''''editor-in-chief@scholarpedia.org''''' (or to the appropriate editors) with subject: 'suggestion for Scholarpedia: X' and body:
+
We are always eager to hear of excellent candidate authors. To suggest an author, send an email to '''''editor-in-chief@scholarpedia.org''''' (or to the appropriate editors) with subject: 'suggestion for Scholarpedia: [author name here]' and body:
 
  <pre>
 
  <pre>
  Article title: Y
+
  Article title: [topic title here]
  Author: X
+
  Author: [suggested author here]
  Email: recent email
+
  Email: [recent email address]
  URL: X's homepage (optional)
+
  URL: [author homepage (optional)]
 
  Affiliation: University of ...
 
  Affiliation: University of ...
  Awards: Nobel prize, Dirac Medal,... (optional)
+
  Major awards: [e.g. Nobel prize, Dirac Medal,... (optional)]
  Suggested by: your Scholarpedia username
+
  Suggested by: [your Scholarpedia username, if you are registered]
  Comment: Why is X qualified to write Y?
+
  Comment: [Explanation for why the proposed author is qualified to write on the proposed topic]
 
</pre>
 
</pre>
If editors will follow your suggestion and if the author agrees the invitation your Scholarpedia index will be incremented by one point. Note that a serious suggestion involves a careful research work, and that, maybe, the person you suggest have already declined our invitation.
+
If editors follow your suggestion and if the author agrees to the invitation your Scholarpedia index will be incremented. Please note that it is entirely likely that an author will have already been invited to write on a particular topic -- we ask that you first look up the topic on Scholarpedia to see if it has already been proposed.
  
 
== Improving articles' contents ==
 
== Improving articles' contents ==
One of the main rules we have in Scholarpedia is that  
+
One of the major distinguishing characteristics of Scholarpedia is that ...
  
'''Scholarpedia articles have authors/curators i.e. qualified scientists responsible for the article's contents.'''
+
'''Scholarpedia articles have curators who are ultimately responsible for the article's contents.'''
  
This means that the ultimate judge for accepting a modification is the article's author (before publication) or curator (after publication), which is also endowed with the right of evaluating your contribution by impacting on your Scholar index. As such, it is not enough to just make any edit you see fit, you need to respect author/curator's work and to ''convince'' the author/curator of its validity.  To have an idea of delicateness of the editing procedure, remember that in Scholarpedia, it is likely that the author/curator of the article invented, discovered or is a major contributor to that research topic: e.g. imagine that you are modifying Einstein's article on Relativity, and that Einstein will be the one evaluating your contribution...
+
This means that the ultimate judge for accepting a modification is the article curator, who is also endowed with the right of evaluating your contribution via your Scholar index. We therefore ask that you be respectful when suggesting edits -- imagine that you are modifying Einstein's article on Relativity, and that Einstein is the one evaluating your contribution.
  
In practice, anything more than minor edits like correcting typos or obvious mistakes should be carefully evaluated in view of your real scientific competences. The best way to proceed for suggesting a content modification is to write it down in the reviews/discussions page associated at each article, and to warn the author/curator with an email. If your suggestions are good, it is likely that the author/curator will encourage you to implement those changes.
+
In practice, anything more than minor edits like correcting typos or obvious mistakes should be carefully evaluated and compared against your expertise in the area. The best way to proceed for suggesting a content modification is to write it down in the reviews/discussions page associated at each article, and to warn the author/curator with an email. If your suggestions are good, it is likely that the author/curator will encourage you to implement those changes.
  
In any case keep in mind the following:
+
To prevent vandalism, we have instituted a number of rules:
 
* After registration your Scholar index is equal to 0. Until your Scholar index is smaller than 1, you are allowed to make just one modification per day.
 
* After registration your Scholar index is equal to 0. Until your Scholar index is smaller than 1, you are allowed to make just one modification per day.
* When saving your modifications, always detail them by filling the comment field.
 
 
* No modification to a published article will be shown in the article main page until the curator will approve it.
 
* No modification to a published article will be shown in the article main page until the curator will approve it.
* Be even more careful in modifying articles before their publication: no one likes to see his/her unfinished work subject to too close a scrutiny.
+
* Author/curator judgment may impact your Scholar index with a mark ranging from +10 to -10. Users that after the evaluation of a modification reach negative Scholar index loose the privilege of modifying article for an indeterminate period, on editor-in-chief's discretion.
* Author/curator judgment may impact your Scholar index with a mark ranging from +10 to -10. Users that after the evaluation of a modification reach negative Scholar index loose the privilege of modifying article for an indeterminate period, on editor-in-chief's discretion.
+
* Stubs (new articles) can be created but not edited: if you want to suggest an article, or if you consider to have a world-wide acknowledged competence to write an article, please contact '''''editor-in-chief@scholarpedia.org''''' (or the appropriate category editor).
+
  
The [[Help:Authors|Help]] and [[Help:Visual_help_for_authors|Visual help]] pages for authors may be useful at this point.
+
A few guidelines that should smooth over the editing process:
 +
* When saving your modifications, always detail them by filling the comment field.
 +
* Be all the more careful when modifying articles in advance of publication: no one likes to see his/her unfinished work subject to too close a scrutiny.
 +
* Stubs (new articles) can be created but not edited: if you want to suggest an article, or if you consider to have a world-wide acknowledged competence to write an article, please contact '''''editor-in-chief@scholarpedia.org''''' (or the appropriate category
  
 
== Joining the editorial team ==
 
== Joining the editorial team ==
Line 56: Line 61:
 
* Become an editor: established experts are invited to become editors in subtopics that do not yet have an editor. [[Scholarpedia:Become_an_editor|Become an editor]]. [[Scholarpedia:Editor's quick start|Editor's quick start]].
 
* Become an editor: established experts are invited to become editors in subtopics that do not yet have an editor. [[Scholarpedia:Become_an_editor|Become an editor]]. [[Scholarpedia:Editor's quick start|Editor's quick start]].
  
== If you still have questions ==
+
If your are interested in joining the editorial team, or if you have any questions that are not answered on the Scholarpedia help pages, please, don't hesitate to get in touch with us:  '''''help@scholarpedia.org'''''
 
+
Get in touch with someone from the editorial team at '''''help@scholarpedia.org'''''
+
  
 
[[Category:Help]][[Category:Help:Users]]
 
[[Category:Help]][[Category:Help:Users]]

Revision as of 12:39, 19 January 2010

Figure 1: Scholarpedia is a collaborative project that welcomes contributions from all over the world. Image: crystal structure of Pu(1,2-HOPO)4, courtesy of Kenneth N. Raymond.

This Help:Users page provides orientation to first-time users who have decided to join Scholarpedia of their own accord.

Please not that if you are interested only in reading through articles, registration is unnecessary.

If you are interested in contributing to the development of Scholarpedia, then first of all: thanks! Secondly, please take a quick look at the following instructions -- Scholarpedia is different from Wikipedia. In particular, Scholarpedia has instituted a set of rules that are aimed at ensuring that its pages remain trustworthy and authoritative.

To begin contributing, you will need to do the following:

  1. register for a user account
  2. read these instructions
  3. read the Scholarpedia main page, which gives a detailed overview of the project and its policies are detailed.

As your contributions are evaluated by authors and editors, your scholar index will increase, leading to increased privileges and prominence in the Scholarpedia community. Detailed below are a few ways of helping out.

Suggesting authors/titles

Authors of Scholarpedia are always invited by editors, on the basis of the following rule of thumb:

original or key inventors/creators/discoverers associated with a topic are invited first, followed by globally acknowledged experts responsible for major and continued advancement in the topic.

If there are multiple acknowledged experts, an election can be initiated. Elections are only necessary when the authors are otherwise unaffiliated with each other --if multiple researchers have worked in close collaboration towards a discovery, co-authorship is preferable to an election.

We are always eager to hear of excellent candidate authors. To suggest an author, send an email to editor-in-chief@scholarpedia.org (or to the appropriate editors) with subject: 'suggestion for Scholarpedia: [author name here]' and body:

 Article title: [topic title here]
 Author: [suggested author here]
 Email: [recent email address]
 URL: [author homepage (optional)]
 Affiliation: University of ...
 Major awards: [e.g. Nobel prize, Dirac Medal,... (optional)]
 Suggested by: [your Scholarpedia username, if you are registered]
 Comment: [Explanation for why the proposed author is qualified to write on the proposed topic] 

If editors follow your suggestion and if the author agrees to the invitation your Scholarpedia index will be incremented. Please note that it is entirely likely that an author will have already been invited to write on a particular topic -- we ask that you first look up the topic on Scholarpedia to see if it has already been proposed.

Improving articles' contents

One of the major distinguishing characteristics of Scholarpedia is that ...

Scholarpedia articles have curators who are ultimately responsible for the article's contents.

This means that the ultimate judge for accepting a modification is the article curator, who is also endowed with the right of evaluating your contribution via your Scholar index. We therefore ask that you be respectful when suggesting edits -- imagine that you are modifying Einstein's article on Relativity, and that Einstein is the one evaluating your contribution.

In practice, anything more than minor edits like correcting typos or obvious mistakes should be carefully evaluated and compared against your expertise in the area. The best way to proceed for suggesting a content modification is to write it down in the reviews/discussions page associated at each article, and to warn the author/curator with an email. If your suggestions are good, it is likely that the author/curator will encourage you to implement those changes.

To prevent vandalism, we have instituted a number of rules:

  • After registration your Scholar index is equal to 0. Until your Scholar index is smaller than 1, you are allowed to make just one modification per day.
  • No modification to a published article will be shown in the article main page until the curator will approve it.
* Author/curator judgment may impact your Scholar index with a mark ranging from +10 to -10. Users that after the evaluation of a modification reach negative Scholar index loose the privilege of modifying article for an indeterminate period, on editor-in-chief's discretion.

A few guidelines that should smooth over the editing process:

  • When saving your modifications, always detail them by filling the comment field.
  • Be all the more careful when modifying articles in advance of publication: no one likes to see his/her unfinished work subject to too close a scrutiny.
  • Stubs (new articles) can be created but not edited: if you want to suggest an article, or if you consider to have a world-wide acknowledged competence to write an article, please contact editor-in-chief@scholarpedia.org (or the appropriate category

Joining the editorial team

  • Become an assistant editor: for graduate students and post-docs, this is the fast track for making positive contributions to Scholarpedia. See the tasks of an AE.

If your are interested in joining the editorial team, or if you have any questions that are not answered on the Scholarpedia help pages, please, don't hesitate to get in touch with us: help@scholarpedia.org

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Focal areas
Activity
Tools