lecture 12

From Scholarpedia

< An introduction to Lie algebra cohomology
This article has not been published yet; It may be unfinished, contain inaccuracies or unapproved changes.

Author: Dr. Jan A. Sanders, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Author: Dr. Sara Lombardo, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Contents

Construction of an extension

Now one turns the question around. What is the situation if one has Lie algebras {\mathfrak{g}} (projective) and {\mathfrak{h}}.

definition

If \alpha^0\in End(\mathfrak{h}) can be written as

\alpha^0 h=[\alpha,h],\quad \alpha,h\in\mathfrak{h}

one says that \alpha^0 is inner and we denote the space of inner endomorphisms by \mathfrak{ad}(\mathfrak{h}). If

\alpha^0[h_1,h_2]=[\alpha^0 h_1,h_2]+[h_1,\alpha^0 h_2]

then \alpha^0 is called a derivation and the space of derivations is denoted by \mathfrak{der}(\mathfrak{h}).

proposition

If \alpha^0, \beta^0\in\mathfrak{der}(\mathfrak{h}) then [\alpha^0,\beta^0]\in\mathfrak{der}(\mathfrak{h}).

proposition

[\mathfrak{der}(\mathfrak{h}),\mathfrak{ad}(\mathfrak{h})]\subset \mathfrak{ad}(\mathfrak{h})

proof

[\mathfrak{d},\mathrm{ad}(\alpha)]h=\mathfrak{d}[\alpha,h]-[\alpha,\delta h]=[\mathfrak{d}\alpha,h]=\mathrm{ad}(\mathfrak{d}\alpha)h

definition

Let

\mathfrak{out}(\mathfrak{h})=\mathfrak{der}(\mathfrak{h})/\mathfrak{ad}(\mathfrak{h})

To see how one should define a Lie algebra structure on the sum of {\mathfrak{g}} and {\mathfrak{h}}, it pays to have a look at {\mathfrak{k}}. Every element in y\in{\mathfrak{k}} can be uniquely written as \sigma(x)+\iota(h), x\in{\mathfrak{g}}, h\in{\mathfrak{h}}: take x=p(y) andh=\iota^{-1} (1-\sigma p)(y). Let \phi:{\mathfrak{k}}\rightarrow {\mathfrak{h}}\oplus_R{\mathfrak{g}} be defined by \phi(\sigma(x)+\iota(h))=(h,x). Then

\phi([\sigma(x)+\iota(h_1),\sigma(y)+\iota(h_2)])=\phi([\sigma(x),\sigma(y)]+[\iota(h_1),\sigma(y)]+[\sigma(x),\iota(h_2)]+\iota([h_1,h_2]))
=\phi(\sigma([x,y])-\iota(h^2(x,y))+[\iota(h_1),\sigma(y)]+[\sigma(x),\iota(h_2)]+\iota([h_1,h_2]))
=([h_1,h_2]+{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x)h_2-{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(y)h_1-h^2(x,y),[x,y])

Suppose d^{(0)}:\mathfrak{g}\rightarrow\mathfrak{out}(\mathfrak{h}) is a Lie algebra homomorphism. Let

d^{(0)}=[\mathbf{d}^{(0)}]

with

(1)
\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x,y])=ad(h^2(x,y))+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x)\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(y) -\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(y)\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x)

(Since d^{(0)}\in\mathfrak{out}(\mathfrak{h}) is a representation, \mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x,y])-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x)\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(y) +\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(y)\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x) must be an inner derivation, represented by an element in \mathfrak{h} depending linearly on x and y, and denoted by h^2(x,y).)

definition

One defines

[(h_1,x_1),(h_2,x_2)]=([h_1,h_2]+{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_1)h_2-{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_2)h_1-h^2(x_1,x_2),[x_1,x_2])

lemma

The new bracket [\cdot,\cdot] obeys the Jacobi identity as long as h^2\in Z_\wedge^2(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{h}).

proof

[[(h_1,x_1),(h_2,x_2)],(h_3.x_3)]-[(h_1,x_1),[(h_2,x_2),(h_3,x_3)]]+[(h_2,x_2),[(h_1,x_1),(h_3,x_3)]]
=[([h_1,h_2]+{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_1)h_2-{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_2)h_1-h^2(x_1,x_2),[x_1,x_2]),(h_3,x_3)]
-[(h_1,x_1),([h_2,h_3]+{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_2)h_3-{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_3)h_2-h^2(x_2,x_3),[x_2,x_3])]
+[(h_2,x_2),([h_1,h_3]+{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_1)h_3-{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_3)h_1-h^2(x_1,x_3),[x_1,x_3])]
=([[h_1,h_2]+{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_1)h_2-{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_2)h_1-h^2(x_1,x_2),h_3]+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_1,x_2])h_3 -\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)([h_1,h_2]+{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_1)h_2-{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_2)h_1-h^2(x_1,x_2))-h^2([x_1,x_2],x_3),[[x_1,x_2],x_3])
-([h_1,[h_2,h_3]+{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_2)h_3-{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_3)h_2-h^2(x_2,x_3)] +\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)([h_2,h_3]+{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_2)h_3-{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_3)h_2-h^2(x_2,x_3)) -\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_2,x_3])h_1-h^2(x_1,[x_2,x_3]),[x_1,[x_2,x_3]])
+([h_2,[h_1,h_3]+{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_1)h_3-{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_3)h_1-h^2(x_1,x_3)] +\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)([h_1,h_3]+{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_1)h_3-{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_3)h_1-h^2(x_1,x_3)) -\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_1,x_3])h_2-h^2(x_2,[x_1,x_3]), [x_2,[x_1,x_3]])
=([{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_1)h_2,h_3]-[{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_2)h_1,h_3]-[h^2(x_1,x_2),h_3]+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_1,x_2])h_3 -\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)[h_1,h_2]-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3){\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_1)h_2+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3){\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_2)h_1 +\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)h^2(x_1,x_2)-h^2([x_1,x_2],x_3)
-[h_1,{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_2)h_3]+[h_1,{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_3)h_2]+[h_1,h^2(x_2,x_3)] -\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)[h_2,h_3]-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1){\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_2)h_3+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1){\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_3)h_2 +\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)h^2(x_2,x_3) +\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_2,x_3])h_1+h^2(x_1,[x_2,x_3])
+[h_2,{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_1)h_3]-[h_2,{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_3)h_1]-[h_2,h^2(x_1,x_3)] +\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)[h_1,h_3]+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2){\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_1)h_3-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2){\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_3)h_1 -\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)h^2(x_1,x_3)-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_1,x_3])h_2-h^2(x_2,[x_1,x_3]), 0)
=([-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)[h_2,h_3]+[h_2,{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_1)h_3]+[{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_1)h_2,h_3]
+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)[h_1,h_3]-[h_1,{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_2)h_3] -[{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_2)h_1,h_3]
-[h_2,{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_3)h_1]+[h_1,{\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_3)h_2]-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)[h_1,h_2]
-[h^2(x_1,x_2),h_3]+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_1,x_2])h_3 -\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1){\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_2)h_3+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2){\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_1)h_3
-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3){\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_1)h_2 +\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1){\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_3)h_2-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_1,x_3])h_2-[h_2,h^2(x_1,x_3)]
+[h_1,h^2(x_2,x_3)]+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3){\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_2)h_1 +\mathbf{d}([x_2,x_3])h_1-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2){\mathbf{d}^{(0)}}(x_3)h_1
+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)h^2(x_1,x_2)-h^2([x_1,x_2],x_3)
+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)h^2(x_2,x_3) +h^2(x_1,[x_2,x_3])
-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)h^2(x_1,x_3)-h^2(x_2,[x_1,x_3]), 0)
=(\mathbf{d}^2h^2(x_1,x_2,x_3),0)
=(0,0)

proposition

\mathbf{d}^2h^2(x_1,x_2,x_3)\in\mathcal{C}(\mathfrak{h})

proof

\mathrm{ad}(\mathbf{d}^2h^2(x_1,x_2,x_3))
=\mathrm{ad}(\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)h^2(x_2,x_3))-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)h^2(x_1,x_3)+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)h^2(x_1,x_2) -h^2([x_1,x_2],x_3)-h^2(x_2,[x_1,x_3])+h^2(x_1,[x_2,x_3]))
=[\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1),\mathrm{ad}(h^2(x_2,x_3))]-[\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2),\mathrm{ad}(h^2(x_1,x_3))] +[\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3),\mathrm{ad}(h^2(x_1,x_2))] -\mathrm{ad}(h^2([x_1,x_2],x_3))-\mathrm{ad}(h^2(x_2,[x_1,x_3]))+\mathrm{ad}(h^2(x_1,[x_2,x_3]))
=[\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1),\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_2,x_3])]-[\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2),\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_1,x_3])] +[\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3),\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_1,x_2])] -\mathrm{ad}(h^2([x_1,x_2],x_3))-\mathrm{ad}(h^2(x_2,[x_1,x_3]))+\mathrm{ad}(h^2(x_1,[x_2,x_3]))
=\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_1,[x_2,x_3]])  -\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([[x_1,x_2],x_3])-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_2,[x_1,x_3]])
=0

corollary

If \mathfrak{h} has no center, one has automatically \mathbf{d}^2h^2=0, which implies that the Jacobi identity is always satisfied. Another way of saying this, is that the choice d^{(0)}\in\mathfrak{out}(\mathfrak{h}) determines an extension

\iota_0 \qquad \quad \ p_0
(2)
0 \quad \rightarrow \quad \mathfrak{ad}(\mathfrak{h}) \quad \rightarrow \quad \mathfrak{k}_0 \quad \rightarrow \quad \mathfrak{g} \quad \rightarrow 0.

proposition

\bar{\mathbf{d}}^2 \bar{h}^2-\mathbf{d}^2h^2\in B_\wedge^3(\mathfrak{g},\mathcal{Z}(\mathfrak{h})).

proof

Let \bar{\mathbf{d}}^{(0)}(x)=\mathbf{d}^{(0)}+\mathrm{ad}(h^1(x)). Then

\mathrm{ad}(\bar{h}^2(x_1,x_2))=\bar{\mathbf{d}}^{(0)}([x_1,x_2])-[\bar{\mathbf{d}}^{(0)}(x_1),\bar{\mathbf{d}}^{(0)}(x_2)]
=\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_1,x_2])+\mathrm{ad}(h^1([x_1,x_2]))-[\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1),\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)] -[\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1),\mathrm{ad}(h^1(x_2))]-[\mathrm{ad}(h^1(x_1)),\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)]- [\mathrm{ad}(h^1(x_1)),\mathrm{ad}(h^1(x_2))]
=\mathrm{ad}(h^2(x_1,x_2))+\mathrm{ad}(h^1([x_1,x_2]))-\mathrm{ad}(\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)h^1(x_2)]+ \mathrm{ad}(\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)h^1(x_1))-\mathrm{ad}([h^1(x_1),h^1(x_2)])
=\mathrm{ad}(h^2(x_1,x_2)-\mathbf{d}^1h^1(x_1,x_2)-[h^1(x_1),h^1(x_2)])

This implies

\bar{h}^2=h^2-\mathbf{d}^1h^1-[h^1,h^1]+\eta^2.\quad \eta^2\in C_\wedge^2(\mathfrak{g},\mathcal{Z}(\mathfrak{h}))

Then

\bar{\mathbf{d}}^2 \bar{h}^2(x_1,x_2,x_3)=\bar{\mathbf{d}}^{(0)}(x_1)\bar{h}^2(x_2,x_3)-\bar{\mathbf{d}}^{(0)}(x_2)\bar{h}^2(x_1,x_3) +\bar{\mathbf{d}}^{(0)}(x_3)\bar{h}^2(x_1,x_2)- \bar{h}^2([x_1,x_2],x_3)- \bar{h}^2(x_2,[x_1,x_3])+ \bar{h}^2(x_1,[x_2,x_3])
=(\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)+\mathrm{ad}(h^1(x_1)))(h^2(x_2,x_3)-\mathbf{d}^1h^1(x_2,x_3)-[h^1,h^1](x_2,x_3)+ \eta^2(x_2,x_3))
-(\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)+\mathrm{ad}(h^1(x_2)))(h^2(x_1,x_3)-\mathbf{d}^1h^1(x_1,x_3)-[h^1,h^1](x_1,x_3)+ \eta^2(x_1,x_3))
+(\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)+\mathrm{ad}(h^1(x_3)))(h^2(x_1,x_2)-\mathbf{d}^1h^1(x_1,x_2)-[h^1,h^1](x_1,x_2)+ \eta^2(x_1,x_2))
+h^2([x_1,x_2],x_3)-\mathbf{d}^1h^1([x_1,x_2],x_3)-[h^1([x_1,x_2]),h^1(x_3)]+\eta^2([x_1,x_2],x_3)
+h^2(x_2,[x_1,x_3])-\mathbf{d}^1h^1(x_2,[x_1,x_3])-[h^1(x_2),h^1([x_1,x_3])]+\eta^2(x_2,[x_1,x_3])
+h^2(x_1,[x_2,x_3])-\mathbf{d}^1h^1(x_1,[x_2,x_3])-[h^1(x_1),h^1([x_2,x_3])]+\eta^2(x_1,[x_2,x_3])
=\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)(h^2(x_2,x_3)-\mathbf{d}^1h^1(x_2,x_3)-[h^1()x_2),h^1(x_3)]+ \eta^2(x_2,x_3))
-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)(h^2(x_1,x_3)-\mathbf{d}^1h^1(x_1,x_3)-[h^1(x_1),h^1(x_3)]+ \eta^2(x_1,x_3))
+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)(h^2(x_1,x_2)-\mathbf{d}^1h^1(x_1,x_2)-[h^1(x_1),h^1(x_2)]+ \eta^2(x_1,x_2))
+\mathrm{ad}(h^1(x_1))(h^2(x_2,x_3)-\mathbf{d}^1h^1(x_2,x_3)-[h^1(x_2),h^1(x_3)]+ \eta^2(x_2,x_3))
-\mathrm{ad}(h^1(x_2))(h^2(x_1,x_3)-\mathbf{d}^1h^1(x_1,x_3)-[h^1(x_1),h^1(x_3)]+ \eta^2(x_1,x_3))
+\mathrm{ad}(h^1(x_3))(h^2(x_1,x_2)-\mathbf{d}^1h^1(x_1,x_2)-[h^1(x_1),h^1(x_2)]+ \eta^2(x_1,x_2))
-h^2([x_1,x_2],x_3)+\mathbf{d}^1h^1([x_1,x_2],x_3)+[h^1([x_1,x_2]),h^1(x_3)]+\eta^2([x_1,x_2],x_3)
-h^2(x_2,[x_1,x_3])+\mathbf{d}^1h^1(x_2,[x_1,x_3])+[h^1(x_2),h^1([x_1,x_3])]+\eta^2(x_2,[x_1,x_3])
+h^2(x_1,[x_2,x_3])-\mathbf{d}^1h^1(x_1,[x_2,x_3])-[h^1(x_1),h^1([x_2,x_3])]+\eta^2(x_1,[x_2,x_3])
=\mathbf{d}^2 h^2(x_1,x_2,x_3)-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)(\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)h^1(x_3) -\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)h^1(x_2)-h^1([x_2,x_3]))-[\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)h^1(x_2),h^1(x_3)] -[h^1(x_2),\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)h^1(x_3)]+ {d}^{(0)}(x_1)\eta^2(x_2,x_3))
+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)(\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)h^1(x_3)-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)h^1(x_1)-h^1([x_1,x_3]))+[\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)h^1(x_1),h^1(x_3)] +[h^1(x_1),\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)h^1(x_3)] -{d}^{(0)}(x_2) \eta^2(x_1,x_3))
-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)(\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)h^1(x_2)-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)h^1(x_1)-h^1([x_1,x_2]))-[\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)h^1(x_1),h^1(x_2)] -[h^1(x_1),\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)h^1(x_2)]+ {d}^{(0)}(x_3)\eta^2(x_1,x_2))
+\mathrm{ad}(h^1(x_1))(h^2(x_2,x_3)-(\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)h^1(x_3)-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)h^1(x_2)-h^1([x_2,x_3])))
-\mathrm{ad}(h^1(x_2))(h^2(x_1,x_3)-(\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)h^1(x_3)-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)h^1(x_1)-h^1([x_1,x_3])))
+\mathrm{ad}(h^1(x_3))(h^2(x_1,x_2)-(\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)h^1(x_2)-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)h^1(x_1)-h^1([x_1,x_2])))
+\mathbf{d}^1h^1([x_1,x_2],x_3)+[h^1([x_1,x_2]),h^1(x_3)]+\eta^2([x_1,x_2],x_3)
+\mathbf{d}^1h^1(x_2,[x_1,x_3])+[h^1(x_2),h^1([x_1,x_3])]+\eta^2(x_2,[x_1,x_3])
-\mathbf{d}^1h^1(x_1,[x_2,x_3])-[h^1(x_1),h^1([x_2,x_3])]+\eta^2(x_1,[x_2,x_3])
=\mathbf{d}^2 h^2(x_1,x_2,x_3)
-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)h^1(x_3) +\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)h^1(x_3)+[h^1(x_3),h^2(x_1,x_2)] + {d}^{(0)}(x_1)\eta^2(x_2,x_3))
+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)h^1(x_2)-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)h^1(x_2)-[h^1(x_2),h^2(x_1,x_3)]    -{d}^{(0)}(x_2) \eta^2(x_1,x_3))
-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)h^1(x_1)+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)h^1(x_1) +[h^1(x_1),h^2(x_2,x_3)] +{d}^{(0)}(x_3)\eta^2(x_1,x_2))
+\mathbf{d}^1h^1([x_1,x_2],x_3)+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)h^1([x_1,x_2])+\eta^2([x_1,x_2],x_3)
+\mathbf{d}^1h^1(x_2,[x_1,x_3])-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)h^1([x_1,x_3])+\eta^2(x_2,[x_1,x_3])
-\mathbf{d}^1h^1(x_1,[x_2,x_3])+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)h^1([x_2,x_3])+\eta^2(x_1,[x_2,x_3])
=\mathbf{d}^2 h^2(x_1,x_2,x_3) + {d}^{(0)}(x_1)\eta^2(x_2,x_3))-{d}^{(0)}(x_2) \eta^2(x_1,x_3))+{d}^{(0)}(x_3)\eta^2(x_1,x_2))
+\mathbf{d}^1h^1([x_1,x_2],x_3)+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)h^1([x_1,x_2])-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_1,x_2])h^1(x_3)
+\mathbf{d}^1h^1(x_2,[x_1,x_3])-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)h^1([x_1,x_3])+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_1,x_3])h^1(x_2)
-\mathbf{d}^1h^1(x_1,[x_2,x_3])+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)h^1([x_2,x_3])-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_2,x_3])h^1(x_1)
=\mathbf{d}^2 h^2(x_1,x_2,x_3) + {d}^2\eta^2(x_1,x_2,x_3)
-h^1([[x_1,x_2],x_3])-h^1([x_2,[x_1,x_3]])+h^1([x_1,[x_2,x_3]])
=\mathbf{d}^2 h^2(x_1,x_2,x_3)+ {d}^2\eta^2(x_1,x_2,x_3)

proposition

\mathbf{d}^2 h^2\in Z^3(\mathfrak{g},\mathcal{Z}(\mathfrak{h}))

proof

d^3  \mathbf{d}^2 h^2(x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4)=d^{(0)}(x_1)\mathbf{d}^2 h^2(x_2,x_3,x_4) -d^{(0)}(x_2)\mathbf{d}^2 h^2(x_1,x_3,x_4)+d^{(0)}(x_3)\mathbf{d}^2 h^2(x_1,x_2,x_4)-d^{(0)}(x_4)\mathbf{d}^2 h^2(x_1,x_2,x_3)
-\mathbf{d}^2 h^2([x_1,x_2],x_3,x_4)-\mathbf{d}^2 h^2(x_2,[x_1,x_3],x_4)-\mathbf{d}^2 h^2(x_2,x_3,[x_1,x_4])+\mathbf{d}^2 h^2(x_1,[x_2,x_3],x_4)+\mathbf{d}^2 h^2(x_1,x_3,[x_2,x_4])-\mathbf{d}^2 h^2(x_1,x_2,[x_3,x_4])
=d^{(0)}(x_1)(\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)h^2(x_3,x_4)-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)h^2(x_2,x_4)+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_4)h^2(x_2,x_3) -h^2([x_2,x_3],x_4)-h^2(x_3,[x_2,x_4])+h^2(x_2,[x_3,x_4]))
-d^{(0)}(x_2)(\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)h^2(x_3,x_4)-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)h^2(x_1,x_4)+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_4)h^2(x_1,x_3) -h^2([x_1,x_3],x_4)-h^2(x_3,[x_1,x_4])+h^2(x_1,[x_3,x_4]))
+d^{(0)}(x_3)(\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)h^2(x_2,x_4)-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)h^2(x_1,x_4)+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_4)h^2(x_1,x_2) -h^2([x_1,x_2],x_4)-h^2(x_2,[x_1,x_4])+h^2(x_1,[x_2,x_4]))
-d^{(0)}(x_4)(\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)h^2(x_2,x_3)-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)h^2(x_1,x_3)+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)h^2(x_1,x_2) -h^2([x_1,x_2],x_3)-h^2(x_2,[x_1,x_3])+h^2(x_1,[x_2,x_3]))
-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_1,x_2])h^2(x_3,x_4)+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)h^2([x_1,x_2],x_4) -\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_4)h^2([x_1,x_2],x_3)
+h^2([[x_1,x_2],x_3],x_4)+h^2(x_3,[[x_1,x_2],x_4])-h^2([x_1,x_2],[x_3,x_4])
-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)h^2([x_1,x_3],x_4)+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_1,x_3])h^2(x_2,x_4) -\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_4)h^2(x_2,[x_1,x_3])
+h^2([x_2,[x_1,x_3]],x_4)+h^2([x_1,x_3],[x_2,x_4])-h^2(x_2,[[x_1,x_3],x_4])
-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)h^2(x_3,[x_1,x_4])+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)h^2(x_2,[x_1,x_4]) -\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_1,x_4])h^2(x_2,x_3)
+h^2([x_2,x_3],[x_1,x_4])+h^2(x_3,[x_2,[x_1,x_4]])-h^2(x_2,[x_3,[x_1,x_4]])
+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)h^2([x_2,x_3],x_4)-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_2,x_3])h^2(x_1,x_4) +\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_4)h^2(x_1,[x_2,x_3])
-h^2([x_1,[x_2,x_3]],x_4)-h^2([x_2,x_3],[x_1,x_4])+h^2(x_1,[[x_2,x_3],x_4])
+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)h^2(x_3,[x_2,x_4])-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3) h^2(x_1,[x_2,x_4]) +\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_2,x_4])h^2(x_1,x_3)
-h^2([x_1,x_3],[x_2,x_4])-h^2(x_3,[x_1,[x_2,x_4]])+h^2(x_1,[x_3,[x_2,x_4]])
-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)h^2(x_2,[x_3,x_4])+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)h^2(x_1,[x_3,x_4]) -\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_3,x_4])h^2(x_1,x_2)
+h^2([x_1,x_2],[x_3,x_4])+h^2(x_2,[x_1,[x_3,x_4]])-h^2(x_1,[x_2,[x_3,x_4]])
=-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_4)\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)h^2(x_1,x_2)+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3) \mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_4)h^2(x_1,x_2)-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_3,x_4])h^2(x_1,x_2)
-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_4)h^2(x_1,x_3)+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_4)\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)h^2(x_1,x_3)  +\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_2,x_4])h^2(x_1,x_3)
-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3) \mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)h^2(x_1,x_4)+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)h^2(x_1,x_4) -\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_2,x_3])h^2(x_1,x_4)
+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_4)h^2(x_2,x_3)-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_4)\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)h^2(x_2,x_3) -\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_1,x_4])h^2(x_2,x_3)
-\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3)h^2(x_2,x_4)\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_3) \mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)h^2(x_2,x_4)+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_1,x_3])h^2(x_2,x_4)
+\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)h^2(x_3,x_4) -\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_2)\mathbf{d}^{(0)}(x_1)h^2(x_3,x_4) -\mathbf{d}^{(0)}([x_1,x_2])h^2(x_3,x_4)
=-\mathrm{ad}(h^2(x_3,x_4))h^2(x_1,x_2)+\mathrm{ad}(h^2(x_2,x_4))h^2(x_1,x_3)-\mathrm{ad}(h^2(x_2,x_3))h^2(x_1,x_4)
-\mathrm{ad}(h^2(x_1,x_4))h^2(x_2,x_3)+\mathrm{ad}(h^2(x_1,x_3))h^2(x_2,x_4)-\mathrm{ad}(h^2(x_1,x_2))h^2(x_3,x_4)
=0

corollary

The choice of d^{(0)}\in\mathfrak{out}(\mathfrak{h}) determines a cohomology class [\mathbf{d}^2 h^2]\in H^3(\mathfrak{g},\mathcal{Z}(\mathfrak{h})).

proposition

One can see \mathfrak{h} as a semidirect sum \mathcal{Z}(\mathfrak{h})\oplus_{[\nu]}\mathfrak{ad}(\mathfrak{h}), where [\nu]\in H^2(\mathfrak{ad}(\mathfrak{h}),\mathcal{Z}(\mathfrak{h}))^\mathfrak{g}.

question

Why \mathfrak{g} invariant?




definition

We denote the new Lie algebra by {\mathfrak{g}}{\oplus}_{h^2} {\mathfrak{h}}, the semidirect product of {\mathfrak{g}} and {\mathfrak{h}} induced by h^2 \in Z_\wedge^2({\mathfrak{g}},{\mathfrak{h}}).

theorem

Let a^2 be as defined in lecture two. Then

\mathfrak{k}\simeq \mathfrak{a}\oplus_{a^2} \mathfrak{g}.

proof

Consider \mathfrak{a}\oplus_{a^2}\mathfrak{g}, where the representation d^{(0)} and the form a^2\in Z^2(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{a}) are constructed as in the second lecture. Let \phi: \mathfrak{a}\oplus_{a^2}\mathfrak{g}\rightarrow \mathfrak{k} be defined by \phi((a,x))=\iota(a)+\sigma(x). Then

\phi([(a_1,x_1),(a_2,x_2)])=\phi((d_+^{(0)}(x_1)a_2-d_-^{(0)}(x_2)a_1-a^2(x_1,x_2),[x_1,x_2]))
=\iota(d_+^{(0)}(x_1)a_2-d_-^{(0)}(x_2)a_1-a^2(x_1,x_2))+\sigma([x_1,x_2])
=[\sigma(x_1),\iota(a_2)]+[\iota(a_1),\sigma(x_2)]+[\sigma(x_1),\sigma(x_2)]
=[\iota(a_1)+\sigma(x_1),\iota(a_2)+\sigma(x_2)]
=[\phi((a_1,x_1)),\phi((a_2,x_2))].

Let now \psi:\mathfrak{k}\rightarrow  \mathfrak{a}\oplus_{a^2}\mathfrak{g} be defined by

\psi(x)=(\iota^{-1}(x-\sigma(p(x))),p(x)).

Then

\psi([x,y])=(\iota^{-1}([x,y]-\sigma(p([x,y]))),p([x,y]))
=(\iota^{-1}([x,y]-\sigma([p(x),p(y)])),[p(x),p(y)])
=(\iota^{-1}([x,y]-[\sigma(p(x)),\sigma(p(y))]-\iota a^2(p(x),p(y))),[p(x),p(y))])
=(\iota^{-1}([x-\sigma(p(x)),\sigma(p(y))]+[\sigma(p(x)),y-\sigma(p(y))]-\iota a^2(p(x),p(y))),[p(x),p(y))])
=(\iota^{-1}([\sigma(p(x)),y-\sigma(p(y))])+\iota^{-1}([x-\sigma(p(x),\sigma(p(y))])-a^2(p(x),p(y)),[p(x),p(y)])
=(d_+^{(0)}(p(x))\iota^{-1}(y-\sigma(p(y)))-d_-^{(0)}(p(y))\iota^{-1}(x-\sigma(p(x))-a^2(p(x),p(y)),[p(x),p(y)])
=[(\iota^{-1}(x-\sigma(p(x))),p(x)),(\iota^{-1}(y-\sigma(p(y))),p(y))]
=[\psi(x),\psi(y)]

This implies that \phi and \psi are Leibniz algebra homomorphisms. Furthermore,

\phi(\psi(x))=\phi((\iota^{-1}(x-\sigma(p(x))),p(x)))
= x-\sigma(p(x))+\sigma(p(x)
=x

and

\psi(\phi(a,x))=\psi(\iota(a)+\sigma(x))
=(\iota^{-1}(\iota(a)+\sigma(x)-\sigma(p(\iota(a)+\sigma(x))),\sigma(p(\iota(a)+\sigma(x)))
=(\iota^{-1}(\iota(a)+\sigma(x)-\sigma(x)),\sigma(x))
=(a,\sigma(x))

This \phi and \psi are Leibniz algebra isomorphisms. One has

\mathfrak{k}\simeq \mathfrak{a}\oplus_{a^2} \mathfrak{g}\quad\square

What if one now applies the construction in the second lecture to \mathfrak{a}\oplus_{a^2} \mathfrak{g}? The maps \iota and p are given by

\iota(a)=(a,0)
p((a,x))=x

From the definition of the bracket it follows that p is a Lie algebra homomorphism, for \iota this is trivial since \mathfrak{a} is abelian. One chooses a section \tilde{\sigma} as follows.

\tilde{\sigma}(x)=(a^1(x),x),\quad a^1\in C^1(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{a})

Then

\iota(\tilde{d}_+^{(0)}(x)a=[\tilde{\sigma}(x),\iota(a)]
=[(a^1(x),x),(a,0)]
=(d_+^{(0)}(x)a,0)

and

\iota(\tilde{d}_-^{(0)}(x)a=-[\iota(a),\tilde{\sigma}(x)]
=-[((a,0),a^1(x),x)]
=(d_-^{(0)}(x)a,0)

It follows that \tilde{d}_\pm^{(0)}=d_\pm^{(0)}, which implies that the induced coboundary operators will be the same. Now

\iota(\tilde{a}^2(x_1,x_2))=\tilde{\sigma}([x_1,x_2])-[\tilde{\sigma}(x_1),\tilde{\sigma}(x_2)]
=(a^1([x_1,x_2]),[x_1,x_2])-[(a^1(x_1),x_1),(a^1(x_2),x_2)]
=(a^1([x_1,x_2]),[x_1,x_2])-(d_+^{(0)}(x_1)a^1(x_2)-d_-^{(0)}(x_2)a^1(x_1)-a^2(x_1,x_2),[x_1,x_2])
=(a^2(x_1,x_2)-d^1 a^1(x_1,x_2),0)

and this implies

\tilde{a}^2=a^2-d^1 a^1.

Furthermore

\mathfrak{k}\simeq \mathfrak{a}\oplus_{a^2} \mathfrak{g}\simeq \mathfrak{a}\oplus_{\tilde{a}^2} \mathfrak{g}

and if a^1\in Z^1(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{a}) one has

\mathfrak{a}\oplus_{a^2} \mathfrak{g}= \mathfrak{a}\oplus_{\tilde{a}^2} \mathfrak{g}

theorem

To the short exact sequence of Leibniz algebras

0\rightarrow\mathfrak{a}\rightarrow\mathfrak{k}\rightarrow\mathfrak{g}\rightarrow 0

is associated an

[a^2]\in H^2(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{a})

such that for any a^2\in[a^2] one has

\mathfrak{k}\simeq \mathfrak{a}\oplus_{a^2} \mathfrak{g}

references

  • Alekseevsky, Dmitri ; Michor, Peter W. ; Ruppert, W. A. F. Extensions of super Lie algebras. J. Lie Theory 15 (2005), no. 1, 125--134.[1]

On to the fifth lecture

Back to the third lecture

For authors