Indefinite Metric and BRST Cohomology
From Scholarpedia
| This article is undergoing 2 initial reviews; It may contain inaccuracies and unapproved changes made by anonymous reviewers. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Author: Dr. Carlo Maria Becchi, Genoa University, Italy
Author: Dr. Camillo Imbimbo, Genoa University, Italy
Indefinite Metric and BRST Cohomology
The standard construction of an indefinite norm space is based on a Hilbert space and on the identification of a metric Hermitian operator
with vanishing kernel. The pseudo inner product in the indefinite norm space
is defined by
where the angle brackets define the pseudo inner product in the indefinite norm space while the round ones define the inner product in the Hilbert space. Furthermore the pseudo-adjoint of an operator
is defined by
In the B-F oscillator model the total Hilbert space is identified with the Cartesian product of the fermionic and bosonic Fock space. The metric Hermitian operator
is identified using the Pseudo-Hermiticity condition for
which is equivalent to the Hilbert space relation
One can solve this relation factorizing
into the product of a bosonic operator
and a fermionic one
,
finding
Given
it is easy to verify that
and hence
Furthermore one verifies immediately that both
and
are Pseudo-Hermitian operators.
Further important points are:
- The Fock vacuum
is an eigenvector of
and has positive pseudo-norm,
. Furthermore
.
- Among the single-particle states,
and
have positive pseudo-norm while
and
have negative pseudo-norm.
- Among the single-particle states,
and
. These relations follow from the nilpotency of
since
and
.
- In general the states of
are pseudo-orthogonal to those of
since
is pseudo-Hermitian.
To identify
with the physical subspace of the indefinite norm Fock space one has to address two issues:
- Understanding the physical meaning of states pseudo-orthogonal to the rest of
such as those in
.
- Showing that the states in
have non-negative norm.
Regarding the first issue, one observes that adding arbitrary states in
to states in
does not change their pseudo-inner products. Therefore, from the point of view of the physical interpretation based on the probabilistic interpretation of the pseudo-inner product, two states in
whose difference belongs to
must be considered equivalent
Hence the linear space of physical states
must be identified with
, which is the linear space of equivalence classes of vectors in
.
As for the second question, if the inner product
induced on
by the pseudo-inner product on the original space is definite positive,
is a Hilbert space. This has to
be investigated on a case by case basis.
For the B-F model one proves directly that
is the direct sum of
and the linear span of the vacuum vector
. Therefore
coincides with the equivalence class of the vacuum
which is a Hilbert space since the pseudo-norm of this state is positive.
