Talk:Near infrared imaging

From Scholarpedia

This page is not peer reviewed.

Hi Adam, Thanks for the review. We like all the changes you and the other reviewers made. We made it D_{PF} to avoid confusion that might arise thinking that D, P, and F are separate variables. Thanks for catching isosbestic. We placed a space in the citation as requested. Cheers, David and Mari



No significant comments - I think it basically looks fine.

I've made one minor change in the text - changed "isospectic" to "isosbestic point". I hadn't come across "isospectic" before. The Google Test suggests that it's correct; the Oxford English Dictionary suggests that it's not.

Two minor stylistic suggestions - your abbreviation for "DPF" has "PF" in subscript which it unusual - is that intentional or a formatting thing? And the citation style appears a little clumsy. It's hard to read without at least a space between the surname and date. Is that imposed by Scholarpedia?

Otherwise, I think it's fine. Nice to have a NIRS article on scholarpedia.

All best wishes

Adam (I don't think this is supposed to be anonymous is it?)

Retrieved from "http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Talk:Near_infrared_imaging"
For authors