# Talk:Neuropercolation

From Scholarpedia

Dear Dr. Kozma,

I had a question about the possibility of a slight notational error in the equations in example 3.

Example 3 features the following equation:

$p^{-}_{0} = p^{-}_{1} = p^{-}_{2} = (1-p) = p^{+}_{0} = p^{+}_{1} = p^{+}_{2}$

which expresses the probability of a node being active in the next time step if the minority of the neighbouring nodes are inactive. If I understood the notation correctly, should the LHS of the equation not be:

$p^{-}_{3} = p^{-}_{4} = p^{-}_{5}$ instead of $p^{-}_{0} = p^{-}_{1} = p^{-}_{2}$?