Path integral: mathematical aspects
From Scholarpedia
| This article has not been peer-reviewed or accepted for publication yet; It may be unfinished, contain inaccuracies, or unapproved changes. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Author: Prof. Sergio Albeverio, Bonn University
Author: Dr. Sonia Mazzucchi, Hausdorff Centre for Mathematics, Bonn, Germany
Integrals over spaces of paths or more generally of fields has been introduced as heuristic tools in several areas of physics and mathematics. Mathematically they should be intended as extensions of finite dimensional integrals suitable to cover the applications the heuristic path integrals were originally thought for.
Eponymous naming conventions are: functional integrals, infinite dimensional integrals, field integrals. Feynman path integrals (or functionals), and Wiener path integrals (or integrals with respect to Wiener measures) are special cases. In probability th concept of flat integral also occours. A particular realization of Gaussian path integrals is given by "white noise functionals".
In the article the general terminology "path integrals" will be used.
Probabilistic path integrals
Origins
Wiener, Brownian motion
Wiener measure, Wiener integrals, Brownian motion
Applications
Other Gaussian path integrals
powers of the Laplacian. fields
Path integrals associated with diffusion processes
Path integrals associated with infinitely divisible stochastic processes or infinitely divisible measures
Path integrals associated with stochastic (P)DE's
Stochastic quantization
Asymptotics of path integrals
laplace method
Extensions
discrete spaces, fractals
Applications
Physics Hydrodynamics, Biology, Economics
Feynman path integrals
Origins
In 1948, following a suggestion by Dirac, R. P. Feynman proposed a new suggestive description of the time evolution of the state of a non relativistic quantum particle moving in the
dimensional space under the action of a force field with potential
According to Feynman, the wave function
evaluated at the time
in the point
, i.e. the solution of the Schroedinger equation,
- (1)
should be given by a "sum over all possible hystories of the system", that is by an heuristic integral over the space of paths
such that
:
- (2)
In the formula above
denotes a Lebesgue-type measure on the space of paths,
is the reduced Planck constant and
is the classical action functional of the system evaluated along the path
Feynman's approach is particularly suggestive as it creates a bridge between the classical Lagrangian description of the physical world and the quantum one, reintroducing in quantum mechanics the classical concept of trajectory, which had been banned by the traditional formulation of the theory. It allows, at least heuristically, to associate a quantum evolution to each classical Lagrangian. Moreover it makes very intuitive the study of the "semiclassical limit" of quantum mechanics, i.e. the study of the behavior of the wave function when the Planck constant
is regarded as a small parameter which is allowed to converge to 0. In fact, when
becomes small, the integrand
behaves as a strongly oscillatory function and, according to an heuristic application of the stationary phase method, the main contribution to the integral should come from those paths which make stationary the phase functional
. These, by Hamilton's least action principle, are exactly the classical orbits of the system.
Feynman extended this heuristic formulation to the description of the dynamics of more general quantum systems, including the relativistic quantum fields, and introducing an heuristic calculus that works even when rigorous arguments fail.
Mathematical problems
Despite the successfully predicting power of Feynman path integral, it lacks of mathematical rigour. First of all the Lebesgue-type flat measure
on a space of path is not well defined from a mathematical point of view and cannot be used as ``reference measure, i.e. the measure with respect to which "Feynman measure" has density
.
In 1960 Cameron proved that it is not even possible to construct Feynman measure as a Wiener measure with complex variance, i.e. as limit of finite dimensional approximations of the expression
as the resulting measure would have infinite total variation. Furthermore, it is possible to see that the resulting complex measure would have infinite total variation even on bounded sets (Even the Lebesgue measure on $\R^n$ has infinite total variation, but its total variation on bounded pluri-intervals is finite).
Since it is not possible to give meaning to the Feynman integral of a function
on the space of path
in terms an integral with respect to a
-additive measure, one can try to define
as a linear continuous functional on a suitable Banach algebra of functions
.
Various approaches
Sequential approach
The present approach is the closer to Feynman's original derivation of its formula and it is largely implemented in the physical literature, also as a practical tool for exactly solvable models (see Grosche Steiner).
The starting point is the Lie-Kato-Trotter product formula, which allows one to write the solution of the SChroedinger equation (1) ion terms of a strong limit:
- (3)
where
is the free quantum Hamiltonian operator, and
is the multiplication operator associated to the potential
. By taking an initial datum
belonging to the Schwartz
space
and inserting in Equation (3) the formula for the Green function of the quantum free evolution operator
one gets:
- (4)
The latter expression can be interpreted as the finite dimensional approximation of a path integral. Indeed, if
is a continuous trajectory from
to
, with
, let us set
, fo r
. The exponent in the integrand can be interpreted in terms of the Riemann sum of the classical action functional evaluated along the path
:
These relations can provide a rigorous definition of Feynman integration in two different ways.
One possibility is the study of a generalization of Trotter product formula 3, which is a special case of the semigroup product formula
- (5)
where
is a strongly continuous function from
(or
) into the space of bounded linear operators on an Hilbert space
, while
has to be interpreted as some operator extension of the strong limit
.
In particular if
are self-adjoint operators in
and
, one gets formally the Trotter product formula:
- (6)
(where the sum
has to be suitably interpreted)
Nelson in 1964 applied equation 6 to the rigorous mathematical definition of Feynman path integrals, under the assumption that the potential
belongs to the class considered by Kato (CITATION OR BRIEF DESCRIPTION). Some time later Friedman studied formula 5 in connection with the description of continuous quantum observation.
Another version of the sequential approach is also known as time slicing approximation and consists in the definition of the Feynman integral as the limit of finite dimensional approximations of the form (4), by approximating the paths
with piecewise linear paths or piecewise classical paths.
The time slicing approximation, in particular with piecewise polygonal paths, is extensively used in the physical literature not only as a tool for the definition of the Feynman integral, but also as a practical method of computation for particular solvable models
Analytic continuation
One of the first attempts to the rigorous mathematical realization of Feynman path integrals involves analytic continuation of Gaussian Wiener integrals. In fact, by considering a Wiener measure
with covariance
, and a suitable functional
on the space
of continuous path on the interval
, the following formula holds:
- (7)
If
is complex, the left hand side of () is not well defined, but the right hand side can still be meaningful, provided that the functional
has suitable analyticity and measurability properties. In particular, for
, it is the natural candidate for the analytic-continued Wiener integral.
Concerning the application of this functional to the Feynman path integral representation of the solution of the Schroedinger equation, one considers the heat equation with potential
- (8)
and the representation of its solutions in term of a Wiener integral, i.e. the Feynman-Kac formula:
- (9)
By introducing in equations (8) and (9) a real positive parameter
, related to the physical time, or to the mass, or to the Planck constant, and by allowing it to assume complex values, one gets, at least heuristically, for
the Schroedinger equation and the functional integral representation of its solution. This procedure can be rigorously implemented under analyticity and slow-growing conditions on the potential and on the initial datum. In partrcular it is possible to consider potentials hich are the sum of a quadratic part plus a bounded perturbation, potential with singularities (Nelason and Doss), potentials with particular polynomial growth (Doss) and potentials with exponential growth that are Laplace transform of measures (Albeverio, Brzezniak and Haba)
Daubechies and Klauder approach
White noise
Parseval
Infinite dimensional oscillatory integrals
Non standard analysis
Poisson processes
p-adici
Applications
Quantum mechanics
Stochastic Schroedinger, measurement theory
QFT
Topological field theory
Staistical mechanics (classical-quantum). Feynman-vernon.
Quantum computing
Chern-Simons (Freed,...). Topological invariants (Kaufmann)
Quantum fluids (?)
Dissipative systems
Asymptotics
Sequential: Kumano-Go and Fukushima. Doss Ben arous Stationary phase
Mitoma su Chern Simon
Trace formula (Blanchard, Brzniak)
| Invited by: | Dr. Riccardo Guida, Institut de Physique Théorique; CEA, IPhT; CNRS; Gif-sur-Yvette, France |
